If you have 50 tasks and you want to add a task at position 45, you can't, you have to add it at position 1 and then drag it all the way down.If you delete the conversation in Outlook it permanently breaks the Comments section for that particular task in Planner.Labels go missing - yesterday all my labels had gone missing, today they're back again.But this is what prompted this line of thinking in terms of dependencies. I just checked this now and it seems to have been resolved. then back to buckets again the order that you had specified by dragging and dropping gets lost. a short while back if you changed the group by value between buckets, assigned to, etc. Planner has a far more visually impactful UI and adds deeper levels of collaboration out-of-the-box which is what makes it appealing, but there are many flaws. I guess this is because people are enthusiastic about the product but it doesn't quite match their traditional methodology. On top of that there are also random re-ordering issues which I posted about Strant - Have a look at the user voice ideas at that was posted by Balakrishnan, you'll notice that a lot of people are trying to make the tool fit their needs.
With 40 tasks, what you're left with is having to shuffle the tasks around by dragging and dropping them one above the other. So for tasks 1 through 5 you add task 1 then 2 and so on, but Planner adds task 2 above 1, 3 above 2 and so on. The first problem is that whilst you're working top to bottom in your proposal document, Planner adds the tasks in reverse order and provides no alternative method of adding a task to a specific position (Last, First, etc.). I created the tasks based on a proposal document from top to bottom. I just created a plan with 42 tasks and 4 buckets (somewhat similar to Agile scrum boards). Yes this would require some thinking in terms of manual re-ordering, but at least it would provide a somewhat better experience without having to manually re-order 50 tasks. If this concept was added it would make ordering somewhat easier whereby it could order tasks in each bucket based on dependencies. Something I'd like to add to Planner thinking is the concept of Task Dependencies.
0 kommentar(er)
